Kyle Hence And John Judge To Appear On Air America’s Clout – 5.29.2008 – 9PM EST

Source: Jon Gold’s blog

This week’s debate on Air America’s “Clout” with Richard Greene is destined to be a special one. As it stands right now, the two confirmed “pro-Truth” guests to appear are Kyle Hence, and John Judge, the founders of 9/11 CitizensWatch. Citizenswatch was a watchdog group of the 9/11 Commission that worked alongside the 9/11 Family Steering Committee. Along with the families, they called for the resignation of Executive Director Philip Zelikow, and at one point, they started an advertising campaign “demanding that Bush, Cheney, Clinton, Gore and Rice testify publicly, and under oath before the commission.” They ran “billboard advertisements in the Washington metro rail system for four weeks, as well as quarter-page ads in The Washington Post.” Thus far the one confirmed guest who does NOT agree that we need another investigation is Daniel Pinchbeck, the author of 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl, Tarcher, 2006 and editorial director of the web magazine, Reality Sandwich. Daniel’s position is that we need to move forward, not back.

9/11 CitizensWatch has appeared on C-SPAN:

6/18/2004 (RealPlayer Required)
7/22/2004 (RealPlayer Required)

Kyle Hence is the Executive Producer of “9/11: Press For Truth”, and “In Their Own Words: The Untold Stories Of the 9/11 Families”. John Judge has worked as the Special Projects Assistant to Rep. Cynthia McKinney of Georgia, has been a member of COPA for years, and is writing a critique of the 9/11 Commission Final Report for the 9/11 Research Center.

There are very few people in the world today that understand the problems with the 9/11 Commission as John and Kyle do. Please tell your friends, and family to listen in. As I said, this show is destined to be a special one.

We have investigated ourselves and found …

Glenn Greenwald: Lee Hamilton denies Michael Mukasey’s claim about 9/11

Glenn Greenwald, Salon.com: Lee Hamilton denies Michael Mukasey’s claim about 9/11

I just received the following statement from the Vice Chairman of the 9/11 Commission, Rep. Lee Hamilton, in response to my inquiries last week (and numerous follow-up inquiries from readers here) about Attorney General Michael Mukasey’s claims about the 9/11 attack and, specifically, about Mukasey’s story that there was a pre-9/11 telephone call from an “Afghan safe house” into the U.S. that the Bush administration failed to intercept or investigate:

I am unfamiliar with the telephone call that Attorney General Mukasey cited in his appearance in San Francisco on March 27. The 9/11 Commission did not receive any information pertaining to its occurrence.

(…)

9/11 panel vice chair: No record of Mukasey ‘9/11 warning’

The Raw Story: ‘Cover-up’ attempt in offensive costume flap – 9/11 panel vice chair: No record of Mukasey ‘9/11 warning’

The vice chair of the prominent 9/11 Commission is denying Attorney General Michael Mukasey’s claim that the US received a warning before the attacks of Sep. 11, 2001, Salon reports.

“I am unfamiliar with the telephone call that Attorney General Mukasey cited in his appearance in San Francisco on March 27. The 9/11 Commission did not receive any information pertaining to its occurrence,” said former Rep. Lee Hamilton in a statement received by Salon’s Glenn Greenwald, who has closely followed the Mukasey revelation.

Glenn Greenwald: Why Doesn’t the 9/11 Commission Know About Mukasey’s 9/11 Story?

Nå våkner folk opp til høyre og venstre. Kanskje. Sjekk denne gode artikkelen av Glenn Greenwald på CommonDreams.org:

Why Doesn’t the 9/11 Commission Know About Mukasey’s 9/11 Story?

Last week, during a question-and-answer session following a speech he delivered San Francisco, Attorney General Michael Mukasey revealed a startling and extremely newsworthy fact. As I wrote last Saturday, Mukasey claimed that, prior to 9/11, the Bush administration was aware of a telephone call being made by an Al Qaeda Terrorist from what he called a “safe house in Afghanistan” into the U.S., but failed to eavesdrop on that call. Some help is needed from readers here to generate the attention for this story that it requires.

In that speech, Mukasey blamed FISA’s warrant requirement for the failure to eavesdrop on that call — an assertion which is, for multiple reasons that I detailed in that post, completely false. He then tearfully claimed that FISA therefore caused the deaths of “three thousand people who went to work that day.” For obvious reasons, the Attorney Geenral’s FISA falsehoods themselves are extremely newsworthy, but it is the story he told about the pre-9/11-planning call from Afghanistan itself that is truly new, and truly extraordinary.

(…)

It’s unacceptable for Hamilton to refuse to comment on Mukasey’s claims. The whole purpose of the 9/11 Commission was to ensure that there was full-scale investigation and disclosure of all facts relevant to the 9/11 attacks, including the Government’s actions and inactions in preventing that attack from occurring.

URL:
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/04/03/8071/

Begynner det å bli stuereint å stille 9/11-spørsmål nå da? Ting kan tyde på det…

The Raw Story om Mukasey-saken:

Mukasey hints US had attack warning before 9/11

(…)

Keith Olbermann has now featured the story on MSNBC’s Countdown. “What?” Olbermann asked incredulously after quoting Mukasey. “The government knew about some phone call from a safe house in Afghanistan into the U.S. about 9/11? Before 9/11? … You didn’t do anything about it?”

“Either the attorney general just admitted that the government for which he works is guilty of malfeasant complicity in the 9/11 attacks,” Olbermann commented, “or he’s lying.”

“I’m betting on lying,” concluded Olbermann. “If not, somebody in Congress better put that man under oath right quick.”

(…)

URL:
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Mukasey
_US_had_attack_evidence_before_0401.html

Complete 9/11 Timeline: 9/11 Commission, Al-Qaeda in Italy, Hijackers

Kevin Fenton, Complete 9/11 Timeline: 9/11 Commission, Al-Qaeda in Italy, Hijackers – Additions as of March 30, 2008

New entries this week cover a wide variety of topics. Regarding the 9/11 Commission, members and staff were dismayed by Laurie Mylroie’s Iraq-al-Qaeda potboiler, as was a CIA expert who had the misfortune to sit on the same panel as Mylroie, and the Jersey Girls. Staffers were appalled by executive director Philip Zelikow’s rewriting of a staff statement to imply Iraqi connections to al-Qaeda, and forced him to back down. Zelikow finally accepted the lack of connections between Iraq and al-Qaeda, but Vice President Cheney did not.

(…)

Who Is Sibel Edmonds? With Introduction By 9/11 Family Member Lorie Van Auken

Jon Gold’s Blog: Who Is Sibel Edmonds? With Introduction By 9/11 Family Member Lorie Van Auken

Sibel Edmonds tried her best, to speak with the 9/11 Commissioners regarding the information that she had, which she felt was relevant to the 9/11 investigation. The Commissioners didn’t respond to her, so having heard about us, the 9/11 widows from New Jersey, she contacted us.

(…)

Senators Grassley and Leahy looked into Sibel’s allegations and wrote letters to the Justice Department regarding what Sibel had told them. The letters were made public and it was clear that the Senators considered Sibel’s information to be credible.

Sibel told us that she had taken her story to 60 Minutes. They aired her story.

(…)

Sibel finally met with the Commissioners and gave them lengthy testimony, but in the end the 9/11 Commission didn’t include Sibel’s important testimony in their final report. . . .

- Lorie van Auken

Ørlite gammel: Hence & Widows Open Letter To 911 Commissioners

Hence & Widows, Unanswered Questions/Scoop: *** OPEN LETTER with attached Comment from September 11th Advocates (aka “9/11 widows”)***

Dear 9/11 Commissioners:

Tomorrow Philip Shenon’s book, “The Commission” will be released. I forward the Comment just released by September 11th Advocates (the leading 9/11 family members behind the Commission) along with a comment of my own here:

Some of you have yourselves said the 9/11 Report is “not the last word” on what happened. This is no doubt true. Horribly and tragically true. The next question is of course: what are we (or you) going to do about that? Will you address where you fell short or seek to rectify the situation? For starters, the record now shows that a few of you (you know who you are) were responsible for leaving out details of the Tenet/Black meeting with Rice/Clark on July 10 ‘01 and another with Ashcroft on the 18th. And the Commission left out details of the Global Guardian ‘air-war exercises (normally scheduled for October but moved to Sept), Able Danger ID of four of the future hijackers (per 5 credible witnesses), and the revelations of FBI translator Sibel Edmonds – http://www.justacitizen.com/, several of whose allegations had been confirmed by the likes of senior Senators (and others have confirmed more recent claims).

Jon Stewart takes on the ‘uncensored’ history of the 9/11 Commission

Mike Aivaz & Michael Roston, Raw Story: Jon Stewart takes on the ‘uncensored’ history of the 9/11 Commission

Jon Stewart hosted the New York Times’ Philip Shenon on Monday night to discuss his new book, The Commission: An Uncensored history of the 9/11 Commission. The author described White House obstructionism in the course of the officially-mandated Sept. 11 investigation.

“It is remarkable the efforts that the Bush White House went through to try to prevent the 9/11 Commission from getting the information it needed,” Shenon told Stewart. “The person who was most responsible for that tension was former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales who was then the White House Counsel.” (Emphasis added/uthevelse tilføyet)

(…)

9/11 widows call for new investigation after revelations of White House, commission ties

Nick Juliano, The Raw Story: 9/11 widows call for new investigation after revelations of White House, commission ties

The widows whose political activism was largely responsible for the establishment of a commission to investigate the September 11 attacks say a new book revealing the backstory of the 9/11 Commission proves that their initial concerns about its executive director were correct and demonstrate the need for another investigation.

Philip Shenon, who covered the proceedings for the New York Times, has written a new book, The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation, which was released Tuesday. The book reveals the close ties between commission executive director Philip Zelikow and White House advisers Karl Rove and Condoleezza Rice.

(…)

How They Get Away With It

Michael Green, 9-11 Research: How They Get Away With It

This article will not attempt to prove that 911 is a USGIC (USG Intelligence Community) domestic covert operation, but it will show how such operations are covered up and disguised from their immediate victims, the people of the United States. (Emphasis added/uthevelse tilføyet)

9/11 Commission Report: Second Edition

Hentet fra George Washington’s Blog

9/11 Commission Report: Second Edition

Preface: Now that it has been discovered that the Pentagon, CIA, Vice President and other agencies and officials lied to The 9-11 Commission about the timeline of the military’s reaction to the hijackings, the interrogation of alleged members of Al-Qaeda, orders given regarding response to the hijackings and other issues, the Commission has decided to issue a revised, Second Edition of our Report.

Our revised Second Edition removes all material based on false or unverifiable information provided to us by the United States government.

As such, we hope that this revised Second Edition will lay to rest once and for all the distrust in the government that so many Americans have expressed, and will remove all controversy concerning the events of September 11th.

Tuesday, September 11, 2001, dawned temperate and nearly cloudless in the eastern United States.

Recommendation: Keep monitoring the weather.