Documents show Pentagon now using FBI to spy on Americans

Associated Press / Raw Story: Documents show Pentagon now using FBI to spy on Americans

The military is using the FBI to skirt legal restrictions on domestic surveillance to obtain private records of Americans’ Internet service providers, financial institutions and telephone companies, according to Pentagon documents.

The American Civil Liberties Union expressed outrage at the new revelations, based its conclusion on a review of more than 1,000 documents turned over by the Defense Department after it sued the agency last year for documents related to national security letters, or NSLs, investigative tools used to compel businesses to turn over customer information without a judge’s order or grand jury subpoena.

(…)

Video: The Assassination of Malcolm X: A Riddle Unraveled

The Assassination of Malcolm X: A Riddle Unraveled

Coalition of political Assassinations Anniversary Event with John Judge, Baba Zak Kondo, Cynthia McKinney, Jared Ball, A. Peter Bailey. Moderator Mark Matsimla Thompson. At The Malcolm X & Dr. Betty Shabazz Memorial & Educational Center, New York, NY on 2/21/08

The Coalition On Political Assassinations / COPA:

http://www.politicalassassinations.com/

SannhetssøkingsTips

Noe jeg har lært:

• Stol ikke blindt på noen. Begynner stødige folk plutselig å ytre mambo-jambo, styr unna og si ifra.
• Ikke påstå at Bush-administrasjonen står bak 9/11 fordi du har sett det på film. Ikke tro på TV Fakery fordi du har sett det på film, eller lest om det i Le Monde Diplomatique.
• Gjør din egen research. Snakker du om ting du ikke har greie på fungerer du egentlig som en portvokter. Stikk i strid med intensjonen. Forhåpentligvis. Det er bedre å si for lite, enn for mye.
• Gjør din egen research så du vet når folk snakker tøv.
• Gjør din egen research så vet du hvem som snakker sant.
• Bli skeptisk når såkalte prominente skikkelser i “Bevegelsen” - mer eller mindre - aggressivt pusher ingen-fly-ved-Pentagon, som om ingen-fly-teorien er opplest og vedtatt (som for eksempel David Ray Griffin). Den er ikke det. Mer om det snart.
• Studer tema som desinformasjon, COINTELPRO og psykologiske operasjoner (psy-op). Avgjørende for å forstå cover-up-mekanismene. Det er umulig å forsvare seg mot noe en ikke vet hva er.
• Ikke vær kritisk til agnostikere. Alle, og da mener jeg virkelig alle, burde ha en agnostisk holdning til hva som egentlig hendte. Vi vet at den offisielle konspirasjonsteorien ikke er korrekt. Vi vet at det er behov for en ny etterforskning. Men vi vet ikke eksakt hva som hendte.
• Bli kritisk når folk går for langt i det de sier, de vet akkurat hva som skjedde osv. Dette er også en form for portvokting. Det psykologiske spranget mellom Matrix og en eller annen ukjent og overdimensjonert sinnssyk verden kan fort bli stort. For stort.
• Ikke bland 9/11 med Illuminati, UFO osv. Nok en form for portvokting, uavhengig av om det er intensjonelt. Vanlig latterliggjørings- og tåkeleggingsteknikk.
• Avstå i størst mulig grad fra sterk språkbruk overfor meningsmotstandere. Drøy konfrontasjon skaper bare splid og barrierer, samt alle-piggene-ut-oppførsel. Lett å stikke seg.
• Ikke spam kommentarfelt. Folk leser det ikke allikevel. Mange blir også irritert. Kommentarer er flott, men ikke utallige A4-sider med copy og paste på engelsk.
• Si ifra når folk snakker tull over tid. Ta avstand.
• Si ifra når folk snakker tull over tid. Ta avstand.
• Si ifra når folk snakker tull over tid. Ta avstand.
• Si ifra når folk snakker tull over tid. Ta avstand.
• Si ifra når folk snakker tull over tid. Ta avstand.
• Vær så snill å si ifra. Man avvæpner dem da.

Free speech is always the rallying cry for attacks and disinfo. We aren’t in the business of free speech, we’re trying to expose a cover-up and the other side have lots and lots and lots of free or paid time to abuse everyone if we let them.

- Victoria Ashley

Hvor mye skade hadde Berit Ås og PK Gruppen påført 9/11-sannhet i Norge om alle sa ifra og tok avstand? Vi ville iallefall ikke blitt redusert til - i manges øyne - en gjeng med ukritiske tullebukker.

Video: Conversations with John Judge - Part 1-3

Svært interessante samtaler med John Judge filmet 2/2-02. Et alternativt perspektiv på USAs politikk og historie.

Judge er født og oppvokst i Washington DC, og hadde foreldre som begge jobbet ved Pentagon. Grunnet relevant kunnskap om topografi, forsvar, bakke-til-luft-raketter osv., stiller han de rette Pentagon-spørsmålene.

Blant mye annet.

Anbefales!

***

About John Judge

“You can call me a conspiracy theorist,
if you call everyone else a coincidence theorist.
I prefer to say I’m an alternate historian.”

- John Judge

***

Conversations with John Judge - Part I

Stikkord:

• fyldig om Pentagon, sikkerhetstiltak, standardrutiner, det militær-industrielle kompleks, “militærøkonomi” (etter mitt syn burde det vært mulig å kreve en ny 9/11-granskning, kun basert på spørsmålene Judge stiller)
• strategy of tension, phoney terrorism
• pseudo-demokrati, valg, valgfusk, ekte demokrati, Clinton for riksrett - en etterretningsoperasjon

“Before they have an election they have polls. Well, now… Why would you have a poll in a democratic society? The only purpose is to influence the outcome of the election.”

“In a real democracy you don’t need a Democratic Party.”

“The United States showed, not only us, but the whole world that we are not a democracy.”

World Video Premiere: The Truth about the Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr.

Hentet fra Reprehensor’s Blog

“Truth crushed to earth will rise again.“
- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

MLK Assassination Conspiracy Trial - Part 10 of 10

“Governmental agencies caused Martin Luther King to be assassinated… They caused this whole thing to happen. And they then proceeded with the powerful means at their disposal to cover this case up. This is a conspiracy… and that’s a nasty word. People insult people in this country who use the word “conspiracy.” Nowhere else in the world, as Bill Schaap told you, is it viewed that way. In Italy and France conspiracy is taken for granted because they have lived with it so much longer…

What we’re asking you to do at this point in time is send a message. We’re asking you to send a message, not just right a wrong. That’s important, that you right a wrong and that you allow justice to prevail once and for all. Let it prevail. Let justice and truth prevail, else the heavens fall. No matter what, let it prevail. Let it come forward. We’re asking you to let that happen. But in addition to that, we’re asking you to send a message, send a message to all of those in power, all of those who manipulate justice in this country that you cannot get away with this. Or if you can get away with it, you can only get away with it for so long.“

- Dr. William F. Pepper, closing argument, King Family v. Loyd Jowers and Other Unknown Co-conspirators, December 8, 1999.

Les videre her

NIFS om saken

Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation

Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation

From the Resonant Resurrections Dept: This wise little version of “Cover-ups for Dummies” has been floating on the Net since the late ’90s at least. Given the government/media handling of 9/11, the resulting wars, and recent electoral fraud it often seems our top officials must read it everyday. If we’re to bring the truth alive (…) it may help to occasionally remind ourselves how the pros play the game.

Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly by those at the leadership, key players, or planning level of the criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

Desinformasjon

“In the information society, bad information drives out good information. The proliferation of misinformation causes the dilution of good, factual information. Valuable information on actual cover-ups, for instance, is discredited when other alleged, but non-factual and misleading, conspiracy theories are given undue currency. In short, bad conspiracy theories discredit all assertions of conspiracy, making for fertile ground in which actual conspiracies thrive.” (Emphasis added/uthevelse tilføyet)

www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2004/08-23-2004/facts.htm

“It should go without saying that an investigation of a conspiracy like 9/11 will always a two-front war against disinformation. On one side are the gatekeepers pursuing a limited hangout. On the other side are crackpots and disinfo agents pushing bogus, discrediting evidence. Weeding out bogus claims is neither gatekeeping nor censorship but an absolutely critical activity.” (Emphasis added/uthevelse tilføyet)

- Eric Salter, A Critical Review of WTC ‘No Plane’ Theories

“Disinformation, in order to be effective, must be 90% accurate.”

- Peter Dale Scott

*** *** ***

“It’s not a matter of what is true that counts but a matter of what is perceived to be true.”
- Henry Kissinger

Cosmos intervjuer Jim Hoffman om desinformasjon, fragmenteringen av 9/11-bevegelsen og “Kennenbunkport Warning”-kontroversen

Cosmos, truthaction.org/Truth Revolution Radio, intervjuer Jim Hoffman om desinformasjon, splittelse og “Kennenbunkport Warning“-kontroversen.

Lytt til mp3

Arabesque har laget et transkript av intervjuet som finnes her.

Researcher Jim Hoffman was the guest on the the October 15 edition of Truth Revolution Radio. Jim is the creator of the sites wtc7.net, 911research.com and 911review.com. We had a wide-ranging discussion that covered Jim’s first involvement with 9/11 research and moved on to the topic of disinformation and disruption in the movement, including an expose of the attacks on truthaction.org.

COINTELPRO: Historietime

“Over the years we have been warned about the danger of subversive organizations that would threaten our liberties, subvert our system, would encourage its members to take further illegal action to advance their views, organizations that would incite and promote violence, pitting one American group against another… There is an organization that does fit those descriptions, and it is the organization, the leadership of which has been most constant in its warning to us to be on guard against such harm. The [FBI] did all of those things.” - Sen. Philip A. Hart, Select Committee on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans, 1975

Å bedrive 9/11-aktivisme er som å delta i en krig som utspiller seg på mangfoldige fronter simultant. Det er en kamp mot MSM (mainstream media). Mot dårlig informasjon. Mot “portvoktere” og såkalte skeptikere. Rør så inn i miksen intensjonell villedende informasjon og andre COINTELPRO-lignende (Counterintelligence Program) taktikker, og det er duket for et massivt slag.

Was Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Murdered by the U.S. Government?

John Doraemi, Crimes of the State: Was Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Murdered by the U.S. Government?

(…)

The assassination of Dr. King was one of the most devastating assaults on democracy and the rule of law in our nation’s sordid history. It came in an environment of FBI COINTELPRO harassment and surveillance of opposition leaders. It came as one incident in a string of assassinations which included Black Panther leaders, Malcolm X, John F. Kennedy and his brother Robert Kennedy. The telltale signs of government cover-up followed each of these events.

(…)

Prominent 911 Leader: How to Fight Disinformation

Kilde: George Washington/911Blogger

A prominent 9/11 truth leader sent the following email about disinformation and disruption in the 9/11 movement. I’m waiting for permission to use his name. I assure you, though, that he is someone with no axe to grind, and who is not in “one” camp or the “other”. He cares only about truth.

His message provides a road map for how to deal with the infiltration, co-option, disruption and disinformation which has been unleashed against the 9/11 truth and justice movements, since those movements have the power to pull the rug out from under the whole fascist enterprise.

Allow me to suggest that we don’t need to choose between denunciation, on the one hand, and silence, on the other. That is an unnecessary choice, a false dichotomy.

Denunciation plays into their hands, which is unintended complicity.

Silence is also complicity, as Dr. Martin Luther King pointed out.

Instead of these two approaches, what’s needed is politically relevant education.

Education about agents of all kinds, especially agents provocateurs, their history, who employs them, their tactics.

There is a huge literature on this. We do not need to start at square one. Read about Operation Mockingbird. Read about COINTELPRO. Apply what we learn to today’s situation. Keep digging, learning, discussing, educating.

Victronix’s Good 9/11 Activist Guidelines

1 - Protect alliances

2 - Treat ALL with respect - including military, government, journalists, etc.

3 - Call out and separate from those who abuse others

4 - Call out and separate from those who protect transparent baseless claims (nukes,DEW, etc)

5 - Allow strong civil debate and critique to guide us to the scientific truths

6 - Reject “Big Tent” (pairing of baseless claims with strong evidence)

7 - Reject efforts to pair leaders on stage with UFOs, Fetzer, DEW, “no planes,” etc

8 - Reject all forms of racism

9 - Reject efforts to mix holocaust discussions with 9/11/01

10 - Keep speculation in our own forums, reject those who put it on FOX News, YouTube, etc.

THE CIA AND THE MEDIA

Carl Bernsteins banebrytende artikkel om CIA og media, som ble publisert i Rolling Stone i 1977:

THE CIA AND THE MEDIA: How Americas Most Powerful News Media Worked Hand in Glove with the Central Intelligence Agency and Why the Church Committee Covered It Up

Alsop is one of more than 400 American journalists who in the past twenty‑five years have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. Some of these journalists’ relationships with the Agency were tacit; some were explicit. There was cooperation, accommodation and overlap. Journalists provided a full range of clandestine services—from simple intelligence gathering to serving as go‑betweens with spies in Communist countries. Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors without‑portfolio for their country. (Emphasis added/uthevelse tilføyet)

(…)

Det er liten grunn til å tro at det er noe bedre stilt i dag. Snarere tvert om.

Security Guidelines for Movement Activists

GUIDELINES FOR COPING WITH INFILTRATION

1. Be careful to avoid pushing a new or hesitant member, or one facing personal, financial, or legal problems, to take risks beyond what that person is ready to handle, particularly in situations which could result in arrest and prosecution. People in positions of legal or other jeopardy have proven especially vulnerable to recruitment as informers.

2. Deal openly with the form and content of what anyone says and does, whether the person is a suspected agent, has emotional problems, or is simply a sincere but naive or confused person new to the work.

3. Establish a process through which anyone who suspects an infiltrator (or other covert intervention) can express his or her fears without scaring others. Experienced people assigned this responsibility can do a great deal to help a group maintain its morale and focus while, at the same time, consolidating information and deciding how to use it. This plan works best when accompanied by group discussion of the danger of paranoia, so that everyone understands the reasons for following the established procedure.

Anatomy Of A SWAT From A Lawyer’s Perspective

Lucille Compton, Scoop: Anatomy Of A SWAT From A Lawyer’s Perspective

(…)

Most of us know the term “SWAT” as a reference to an inter-agency team of enforcement personnel who engage in operations to put drug lords and other illegal groups out of business using sophisticated weaponry and state-of-the-art intelligence-gathering methods. A client of mine uses “swat” operation when referring to a complex series of seemingly unrelated actions by a series of governmental agencies, including agencies of judicial, executive and legislative branches, often with the participation and assistance of private individual or corporate informants, to profit from the destruction, silencing, asset seizure or blackmail of an individual or company who is out of favor or has offended some individual or group in power. The purpose of the swat operation is to satisfy the goals of one or more private special interest groups or governmental covert operations, or both. (…)

The most challenging aspect of this type of practice is convincing those who are targets [3] or witnesses of the swat operation that it does, in fact, exist. After all, covert operations are conducted under cover. The very nature of a successful covert operation is to achieve its goals without the general public’s being aware that a single force is responsible for what appears to be a series of unrelated events. In my experience, the bigger the lie, the easier it is to pull off. (Emphasis and link added)

(…)

9/11 Five Years Later: What Have We Accomplished?

Denne artikkelen er noe av det bedre jeg har lest om 9/11 og “bevegelsen”. Den omhandler desinformasjon, COINTELPRO, og den sofistikerte psykologiske operasjonen 9/11 faktisk var; hvorfor ble terroren gjennomført på måten den ble? Et MUST READ!

PS - Undertegnede deler ikke Sferios’ syn når han sier at sjansen har passert for en ny 9/11-granskning, og en eventuell rettsforfølgelse av det kriminelle nettverket. Om bevegelsen klarer å 1) mobilisere mot COINTELPRO, og 2) holde seg til de absolutt sterkeste bevis, tror jeg ennå det kan være håp. Man må leve i trua.

Emanuel Sferios, 9-11 Visibility Project:
9/11 Five Years Later: What Have We Accomplished? An Assessment of the 9/11 Truth Movement

(…)

And now, five years later, what have we accomplished?

In short, everything and nothing. We began this movement to convince the American public and the world that the official story of 9/11 was a lie, and that ruling factions within our own government were the real perpetrators. This we accomplished. Opinion polls conducted over the last two years show that the majority of Americans believe the US government was complicit. We bombarded every mainstream and alternative medium available with information, from Air America to internet blogs. We handed out leaflets in cities and towns across the country, held signs on street corners, wrote letters to everyone we could think of. And you know what? It worked. Today it is rare that I talk to a person who doesn’t believe the US government was involved in the attacks in some way. Compared to just two years ago, when people would look at us like we were crazy for suggesting such a thing, this is an amazing success.

Or so it seems. For at the same time, not a single perpetrator of 9/11 has been prosecuted, and the War on Terror continues unabated, as does the endless stream of lies and propaganda designed to keep us fearful and compliant. Why this discrepancy? What accounts for the 9/11 Truth Movement’s seeming victory in shattering the American public’s blind acceptance of the official story, and the stark reality that nothing has changed politically? In other words, why, in the midst of total success, have we failed?

(…)

Stacking The Patsies of 9/11

Chaim Kupferberg, Global Research: Stacking The Patsies of 9/11

In perhaps the most controversial segment of his landmark article, Chaim Kupferberg argues that, in addition to the “Official” 9/11 Legend, a number of counter-legends were built in so as to generate false leads and to take the emphasis away from the most likely instigators. Plus: A section on former CIA agent Robert Baer and Daniel Pearl.

COINTELPRO

I dagens USA (og i verden) er det vanskelig å tenke seg en bevegelse som ville være mer interessant å infiltrere med agenter og desinformasjon enn 9/11-bevegelsen.

Har man studert 9/11 er det også vanskelig å ikke merke seg at det finnes (det som ser ut som) organiserte forsøk på å ødelegge bevegelsens kredibilitet, fremdrift og i siste instans eksistens. Lar vi dette gå upåaktet hen er det stor sjanse for at nettopp det blir resultatet.

Den eneste metoden for å omgå problemet er å faktisk våge å peke på dårlig informasjon, eksponere dem som sprer desinformasjon, og kanskje poengtere at deres oppførsel, i den grad den er det, er svært lik den av tidligere CoIntelPro-agenter (counter intellegence program).