Første fagfellevurderte “9/11-avhandling” publisert i vitenskapelig journal
Posted by Anders den april 21, 2008
Dette er et historisk øyeblikk for 9/11-bevegelsen. Første publikasjon i en etablert sivilingeniørjournal. Genialt formulert …
Et absolutt MUST READ!!
Lenke til avhandlingen/brevet (pdf. download):
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM
Prof. Jones’ Blog: Publication in a Peer-reviewed Civil Engineering Journal!
Finally! After submitting a half-dozen papers to established peer-reviewed technical journals over a period of nearly a year, we have two papers which have passed peer-review and have been accepted for publication. One of these was published TODAY! In science, we say that we have “published in the literature,” a major step in a nascent line of scientific inquiry.
(…)
In this Letter, we emphasize “points of agreement” with FEMA and NIST, seeking to build bridges for further communications. Of course, we will send a copy to NIST for their comment and hopefully open a public discussion on these crucial evidences and analyses. Note the title – but then read more—the paper only six pages long:
Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
The authors are: Steven E. Jones*,1, Frank M. Legge2, Kevin R. Ryan3, Anthony F. Szamboti*,4, James R. Gourley(…)




april 21, 2008 kl. 4:58 pm
An excellent article!
I wonder how the debunkers are going to debunk this one.
april 21, 2008 kl. 6:18 pm
I could not agree more. It’s brilliant!
Let’s hope it’s “undebunkible”.