Peter Dale Scott: Who Paid the 9/11 Hijackers? Al-Hawsawi? Mahmoud Ahmad?
Posted by Anders den april 9, 2008
Peter Dale Scott: Who Paid the 9/11 Hijackers? Al-Hawsawi? Mahmoud Ahmad?
As I reported in the summer of 2003, US and British newspapers briefly alleged that the paymaster for the 9/11 attacks was a well-known agent of the Pakistani intelligence service ISI, Mohammed Sheikh Saeed. There was even a brief period in which it was alleged that the money had been paid at the direction of the then ISI Chief, General Mahmoud Ahmad.[1]
. . . Mohammed Omar Saeed Sheikh, a notorious kidnapper raised in England, and widely reported as a probable agent of ISI, the Pakistani military intelligence service.[3] . . . he may even have been a double agent, recruited inside al-Qaeda and ISI by the CIA.[4]
Subsequent newspaper stories reported on the undisputed relationship of Saeed to ISI, to FBI claims that he wired $100,000 to Atta’s bank account,[5] to a CNN report that these funds came from Pakistan,[6] and the uncontested statement that “Mustafa Ahmed,” having concluded his 9/11 financial business in Dubai, flew on September 11 to Pakistan.[7]
These alarming charges are ignored in the Report. . . .
URL: http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~pdscott/qfhawsawi.html
april 21, 2008 kl. 2:18 pm
Theres a problem with the Mohammed Sheikh Saeed story and that is it came from India with no proof. India claims to have a paper trail as proof of the allegations and yet despite great efforts by the Americans India has failed at every request to produce the evidence. So all we have is a claim by India that Mohammed Sheikh Saeed was involved. India has a proven track record of making false claims about its enemy Pakistan and especially the ISI.