C O L L A P S E ?

-----------------------------

-----------------------------
COVERUP AT GROUND ZERO:
Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the “official investigation” blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a
half-baked farce that may already have been
commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure. --
Bill Manning, Fire Engineering Magazine
-----------------------------
THE JET FUEL; HOW HOT DID IT HEAT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER?
-----------------------------
“The temperature of the fire at the WTC was not unusual, and it was
most definitely not capable of melting steel.”
--
Thomas Eagar
-----------------------------
Read on for ultimate confusion -- and perhaps some answers ...
-----------------------------
"They showed us many fascinating slides" [Eaton] continued, "ranging from
molten
metal which was
still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared
and bent in the disaster".
--Structural Engineer, 3. september, 2002, s. 6
-----------------------------
"Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is very intense. In some pockets now being uncovered, they are finding
molten steel."
--Alison Geyh, PhD
-----------------------------
Molten Metal Flows at Ground Zero (video)
-----------------------------

-----------------------------
Extremely hot metal at ground zero (video)
-----------------------------
Molten Metal Pours from South Tower
-----------------------------

-----------------------------
Eyewitness accounts: Molten metal
-----------------------------
"
The condition of the steel in the wreckage of the WTC towers (i.e., whether it was in a molten state or not) was irrelevant to the investigation of the collapse since it does not provide any conclusive information on the condition of the steel when the WTC towers were standing."
--NIST, Answers to FAQ, pt. 13
-----------------------------
“...we are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse.” --
NIST
------------------------------
"... the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable." --
James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
-----------------------------
"Steven Jones’ call for a “serious investigation” of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down . . . through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges” must be the rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out." --
Max Ayres
------------------------------
Architects & Engineers calling for a new investigation
------------------------------

------------------------------
juli 18, 2008 kl. 5:00 pm
Hi!zlnt! http://invmfodp.com pavxh exfys http://xkwxrcbb.com ksmqt kptwr
juli 18, 2008 kl. 5:00 pm
Hi! otgdp goaha zlarv dbpot
juli 18, 2008 kl. 5:21 pm
Hi! pmmdl zvafh ffime fzdpx