Gammel, men veldig god: The Big Lie - The “War” On Terrorism is a Total Fabrication
Posted by Anders den mars 27, 2008
David Ratcliffe, www.ratical.org: Domestic Terrorism: The Big Lie - The “War” On Terrorism is a Total Fabrication
The government’s explanation of precisely who is the enemy has never been buttressed with facts that would stand up in a court of law. In the 2002 edition of his book The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence, Could The U.S. War On Terrorism Go Nuclear? Professor Francis Boyle describes how “the accounts provided by the United States government [of those responsible for the 9-11 bombings] simply do not add up.”
The Facts
The October 3 edition of the New York Times recounted the definitive briefing by a US ambassador to NATO officials on the alleged facts as follows:
One Western official at NATO said the briefings, which were oral, without slides or documents, did not report any direct order from Mr. Bin Laden, nor did they indicate that the Taliban knew about the attacks before they happened.
A senior diplomat for one closely allied nation characterized the briefing as containing “nothing particularly new or surprising,” adding: “It was rather descriptive and narrative rather then forensic. There was no attempt to build a legal case.”
In other words, there was no real case against Al Qaeda, Bin Laden, and the Taliban government of Afghanistan. Such was the conclusion of senior diplomats from friendly nations who attended the so-called briefing.
(…)
. . . Our U.S. intelligence agencies, funded annually for decades with increasingly extravagant budgets, claim they were unable to prevent the 9-11 bombings due to the lack of correlated intelligence gathered. Yet within the span of less than a day, these same agencies asserted the identity of those responsible with such certainty as to preclude any serious investigation of other possible perpetrators. Whose interests are truly served by such investigations and their near instantaneous conclusions? (Emphasis added throughout/uthevelse tilføyet)
mars 28, 2008 kl. 1:26 am
Clear cut article. It comes down to, and always has done, a question of ‘agendas’. The agenda of the ‘elite’, who hide behind the veil of ‘democracy’, is always to control the ‘masses’. ‘Democracy’, as it is put into practice throughout the world (based on the US model) is about subjugating the majority of people through a kind of blind obedience to the ‘rule of law’. A ‘rule of law’ designed to protect the ruling elite. Any perceived threat to that ‘rule of law’ is immediately acted upon. There is no allowance for parallel systems of belief or ‘rules of law’.
mars 28, 2008 kl. 2:10 pm
Great article. Clear cut comment.