Dissonerende krigskamerater: Terrorfinansierere hjemme og “over there”, ISIs general Mahmoud Ahmad og 9/11-kommisjonen
Posted by Anders den mars 26, 2008
Oppdatert 9/4-08
Kean-kommisjonens oppdrag:
About the Commission
The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, an independent, bipartisan commission created by congressional legislation and the signature of President George W. Bush in late 2002, is chartered to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks. The Commission is also mandated to provide recommendations designed to guard against future attacks. (Uthevelse tilføyet)
HAR MAN fulgt nyhetsbildet de siste ukene har det vært uunngåelig å ikke få med seg PSTs siste anslag mot somaliske “terrorfinansierere”. Viktigheten av å stoppe mennesker som støtter terrornettverk økonomisk burde for de fleste være åpenbar. Terrorister uten driftsmidler får ikke utrettet stort.
I Norge kan den slags finansiering straffes med fengsel i inntil ti år, hvilket gjør det til et relativt alvorlig lovbrudd etter hjemlig målestokk.
Straffelovens paragraf 147b - finansiering: Med fengsel i inntil ti år straffes den som fremskaffer eller samler inn penger eller andre formuesgoder, med det forsett at formuesgodene helt eller delvis skal finansiere terrorhandlinger eller andre overtredelser av § 147a.
Usamerikanske myndigheter - som jo har funnet opp konseptet “krigen mot terror” - og 9/11-kommisjonen, synes derimot terrorfinansiering er av “liten praktisk betydning”.
To date, the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little practical significance. (Uthevelse tilføyet)
Underlig holdning, om man vil forhindre terror. Underlig også, om målet er å vinne den evigvarende krigen mot terror. Å etterleve eget mandat var øyensynlig mer enn Kean-kommisjonens mandat rommet.
Videre i 9/11-kommisjonens rapport:
Our investigation has uncovered no credible evidence that any person in the United States gave the hijackers substantial financial assistance. Similarly, we have seen no evidence that any foreign government-or foreign government official-supplied any funding. s. 131 (Uthevelse tilføyet)
Dette er rett og slett feil. General Mahmoud Ahmad, som etter mer enn sigende beordret overføringen av $100.000 til Mohamed Atta kort tid før 9/11, ble rapportert å ha møtt representanter fra USAs politiske etablissement i Washington DC samme morgen terroren utspant seg.
(8:00 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Intelligence Committee Chairs Meet with ISI Head and Possible 9/11 Attack Funder as the Attack Occurs
… At the time of the attacks, ISI Director Lt. Gen. Mahmood Ahmed is at a breakfast meeting at the Capitol with the chairmen of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, Senator Bob Graham (D) and Representative Porter Goss (R) (Goss is a 10-year veteran of the CIA’s clandestine operations wing). The meeting is said to last at least until the second plane hits the WTC. [Washington Post, 5/18/2002] Graham and Goss later co-head the joint House-Senate investigation into the 9/11 attacks, which has made headlines for saying there was no “smoking gun” of Bush knowledge before 9/11. [Washington Post, 7/11/2002] . . . Evidence suggests that attendee Mahmood ordered that $100,000 be sent to hijacker Mohamed Atta. . . . Senator Graham says of the meeting: “We were talking about terrorism, specifically terrorism generated from Afghanistan.” The New York Times reports that bin Laden was specifically discussed. [Vero Beach Press Journal, 9/12/2001; Salon, 9/14/2001; New York Times, 6/3/2002]
Now, it just so happens that General Mahmoud Ahmad, the alleged “money man” behind 9-11, was in the U.S. when the attacks occurred. He arrived on the 4th of September, one week before 9-11, on what was described as a routine visit of consultations with his U.S. counterparts. According to Pakistani journalist, Amir Mateen (in a prophetic article published on September 10):
“ISI Chief Lt-Gen. Mahmoud’s week-long presence in Washington has triggered speculation about the agenda of his mysterious meetings at the Pentagon and National Security Council. Officially, he is on a routine visit in return to CIA Director George Tenet’s earlier visit to Islamabad. Official sources confirm that he met Tenet this week. He also held long parleys with unspecified officials at the White House and the Pentagon. But the most important meeting was with Marc Grossman, U.S. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. One can safely guess that the discussions must have centred around Afghanistan . . . and Osama bin Laden. What added interest to his visit is the history of such visits. Last time Ziauddin Butt, Mahmoud’s predecessor, was here, during Nawaz Sharif’s government, the domestic politics turned topsy-turvy within days.”
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/CHO206A.html
På en pressekonferanse 16.mai 2004 ble Condoleezza Rice stilt spørsmål om general Ahmads USA-besøk og pengeoverføring av en indisk journalist:
(…)
Q: Dr. Rice?
Ms RICE: Yes?
Q: Are you aware of the reports at the time that the ISI chief was in Washington on September 11th, and on September 10th $100,000 was wired from Pakistan to these groups here in this area? And why was he here? Was he meeting with you or anybody in the Administration?
Ms RICE: I have not seen that report, and he was certainly not meeting with me.[13]
(…)
I Det Hvite Hus’ og CNNs transkript av pressekonferansen er ordene “ISI chief” utelatt med en blank “—” og “uhørlig”.
Det var/er slett ikke uhørlig (gå til 1:07:50):
Selv om det virker sannsynlig at Rice møtte Ahmad i løpet av hans offisielle besøk, finnes det ingen konfirmerende dokumentasjon. Men, på spørsmålet om pengeoverføringen til Atta må hun ha vært informert, siden FBI selv bekreftet historien. Vi snakker trossalt om USAs nasjonale sikkerhetsrådgiver. Om noen skulle vært informert, var det henne.
“The FBI conducted a detailed financial investigation/analysis of the19 hijackers and their support network, following the September 11th attacks. This investigation initially identified the Al Qa’ida funding sources of the 19 hijackers in the UAE and Germany. The financial investigation also provided the first links between Ramzi Binalshibh and the 9/11 operation. A continuing investigation, in coordination with the PENTTBOMB Team, has traced the origin of the funding of 9/11 back to financial accounts in Pakistan, where high-ranking and well-known Al Qa’ida operatives played a major role in moving the money forward, eventually into the hands of the hijackers located in the U.S.”
- Senate Committee Statement by FBI’s John Pistole, 31 July 2003.
September 30-October 7, 2001: US Media Report Hijackers Received $100,000 from Pakistan
Several media outlets report that, in addition to other transactions, the hijackers received $100,000 wired from Pakistan to two accounts of Mohamed Atta in Florida (see also Summer 2001 and before and Early August 2001). [ABC News, 9/30/2001; CNN, 10/1/2001; Fox News, 10/2/2001; Associated Press, 10/2/2001] . . .
The FBI had information on the money trail. They knew exactly who was financing the terrorists. Less than two weeks later, the findings of the FBI were confirmed by Agence France Presse (AFP) and the Times of India, quoting an official Indian intelligence report (which had been dispatched to Washington). According to these two reports, the money used to finance the 9-11 attacks had allegedly been “wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan, by Ahmad Umar Sheikh, at the instance of [ISI Chief] General Mahmoud [Ahmad].”[10] According to the AFP (quoting the intelligence source):
“The evidence we have supplied to the U.S. is of a much wider range and depth than just one piece of paper linking a rogue general to some misplaced act of terrorism.”[11]
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/CHO206A.html#p3
Det ble også rapportert at Saeed Sheikh overførte penger fra Dubai:
Early August 2001: Saeed Sheikh Receives Ransom Money; Sends $100,000 to Hijacker Atta
The ransom for a wealthy Indian shoe manufacturer kidnapped in Calcutta, India, two weeks earlier is paid to an Indian gangster named Aftab Ansari. Ansari is based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and has ties to the ISI and Saeed Sheikh. Ansari gives some of the about $830,000 in ransom money to Saeed, who sends about $100,000 of it to hijacker Mohamed Atta. [Los Angeles Times, 1/23/2002; Independent, 1/24/2002] . . .
En liten oversikt over de forskjellige rapporteringer, og det som kan se ut som en media-cover-up:
Peter Dale Scott:
Subsequent newspaper stories reported on the undisputed relationship of Saeed to ISI, to FBI claims that he wired $100,000 to Atta’s bank account,[5] to a CNN report that these funds came from Pakistan,[6] and the uncontested statement that “Mustafa Ahmed,” having concluded his 9/11 financial business in Dubai, flew on September 11 to Pakistan.[7](…)
Instead, following a previous reversal in the US media, the financial role attributed earlier to Sheikh Saeed is now given to “Mustafa al Hawsawi,” the name (or pseudonym) used for the financial transactions. The Report treats Shaikh Saeed and al-Hawsawi as two people, whereas earlier they had been identified as the same.[10]
Så, for å oppsummere:
- I Norge straffes terrorfinansierere med inntil 10 år i fengsel, skaper i lang tid overskrifter i all verdens media, og er tema for et utall av debatter. Hawala.
- Usamerikanske myndigheter - våre allierte i “errorkrigen” - mener finansierere er av “liten praktisk betydning”, pleier kontakt med en 9/11-sponsor, hører ikke det hørbare, sitter på mengder av bevis, men gidder ikke etterforske. Cover-up er etterforskning nok. “Alle” aksepterer, for amerikanere er fullstendig inkompetente - tilfeldigvis.
“To date, the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. …”
Hvor lenge skal norske politikere la våre soldater drepe i løgnens og opiumens navn?
Fredsnasjonen Norge og dens rettskafne maktinnehavere.
***
Aktuell info:
- Siste halvdel av Press for Truth
