 | Anders på Første fagfellevurderte … |
 | Jyri på Første fagfellevurderte … |
-----------------------------
COVERUP AT GROUND ZERO:
Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the “official investigation” blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure. --Bill Manning, Fire Engineering Magazine
-----------------------------
"They showed us many fascinating slides" [Eaton] continued, "ranging from molten
metal which was still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared
and bent in the disaster". --Structural Engineer, 3. september, 2002, s. 6
-----------------------------
"Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is very intense. In some pockets now being uncovered, they are finding molten steel." --Alison Geyh, PhD
-----------------------------
Molten Metal Flows at Ground Zero (video)
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
Extremely hot metal at ground zero (video)
-----------------------------
Molten Metal Pours from South Tower
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
Eyewitness accounts: Molten metal
-----------------------------
"The condition of the steel in the wreckage of the WTC towers (i.e., whether it was in a molten state or not) was irrelevant to the investigation of the collapse since it does not provide any conclusive information on the condition of the steel when the WTC towers were standing." --NIST, Answers to FAQ, pt. 13
-----------------------------
“...we are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse.” --NIST
------------------------------
"... the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable." --James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
-----------------------------
"Steven Jones’ call for a “serious investigation” of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down . . . through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges” must be the rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out." --Max Ayres
------------------------------
Architects & Engineers calling for a new investigation
------------------------------
------------------------------Posted by Anders den juli 16, 2007
Hvorfor er det så mange som ikke er villige til å se nærmere på 9/11-saken, men kun avfeier det hele a priori som sprøyt, sludder og pølsevev? Kan kognitiv dissonans være en del av forklaringen?
Hentet fra TruthMove.org
juli 16, 2007 kl. 9:59 pm
Det gikk litt sakte, måtte tenke meg om flere ganger.)
juli 16, 2007 kl. 10:19 pm
Det er ikke så enkelt som det ser ut til, må konse ganske mye… Fasinerende!